{"id":1165,"date":"2011-12-18T08:36:05","date_gmt":"2011-12-18T08:36:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/2011\/12\/18\/blackmail-twist-in-raman-singh-channel-war\/"},"modified":"2011-12-18T08:36:05","modified_gmt":"2011-12-18T08:36:05","slug":"blackmail-twist-in-raman-singh-channel-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/blackmail-twist-in-raman-singh-channel-war\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Blackmail\u2019 twist in Raman Singh-channel war"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> \tRaipur : It began as an expose: the story of how Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh&rsquo;s relatives allegedly received illegal mining contracts in Madhya Pradesh. Then, a tale of arm-twisting: government officials forced cable operators to pull out the news channel, Etv MP, that aired the story. Now, the story has a twist: Allegations of a failed &ldquo;paid-news&rdquo; deal.<\/p>\n<p> \tOfficials claim that the channel carried the report&mdash;which Singh claims is baseless&mdash;after the government refused to budge to its demand for &ldquo;paid news.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> \t&ldquo;It&rsquo;s sad that the government is being blackmailed to resort to paid news. We cannot succumb to such journalism,&rdquo; government spokesperson N Baijdendra Kumar told The Indian Express.<\/p>\n<p> \tA series of letters written by Jagdish Chandra Qatil, Urdu and Hindi channel head of Etv Network, to the Chief Minister&rsquo;s Office (CMO) shows the channel demanded a 100 per cent increase in the government&rsquo;s advertisement budget for electronic media, removal of a senior government official and had threatened not to carry government advertisements till the demands were met.<\/p>\n<p> \t&rdquo;During 2010-11, the PRO released advertisements of around Rs 2 crore to Etv MP, while channel&rsquo;s annual budget is around Rs 20 crore&#8230; In such situation&#8230; popular policies of state government do not get space on the channels&#8230; Etv is number one channel of Chhattisgarh. Its advertisement amount should be equal to the advertisement amount of (the) number one newspaper (Dainik Bhaskar),&rdquo; read the letter by Chandra on March 30.<\/p>\n<p> \tOfficials and the channel held talks. On May 10, Chandra acknowledged a &ldquo;Rs 3-crore annual advertisement package&rdquo; in lieu of which the channel &ldquo;shall provide live coverage and logistic support to welfare schemes on merit.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> \tThe agreement then collapsed due to &ldquo;non-cooperative behaviour of certain officials&rdquo; and Chandra wrote another letter to the Chief Minister on July 25. &ldquo;If you could pass on a word to PR officials to ensure that to implement a Rs 3 crore annual advertisement commitment, Rs 40 lakh monthly package is required but so far only Rs 15 lakh has been released&#8230; Once you ensure this, I am sure there shall not be any communication gap between the channel and the PR department&#8230; As far as editorial issues are concerned, you can always express your views to Shailesh Pandey (the channel&rsquo;s Chhattisgarh bureau chief).&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> \tIn a letter on September 12, Chandra demanded a bigger slice of the advertising pie. &ldquo;80-85 % of advertisement budget for media goes to print media&#8230; under such circumstances no regional channel can be financially independent. From April-August 2011, Navbharat (a local paper) got Rs 2.93 crore and Dainik Bhaskar got Rs 2.3 crore advertisement. Together, these papers get advertisement worth minimum Rs 15 crore annually&#8230;&rdquo; He then demanded &ldquo;a separate budget of Rs 20 crore for electronic media, whose provision could be included in the supplementary budget&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p> \tIn 2008-09, the channel got around Rs 98 lakh in advertisement from the government which went up by 100 per cent to Rs 2 crore in a year.<\/p>\n<p> \tAs the government still did not pay heed to Chandra&rsquo;s suggestions, he shot off another letter to Raman Singh on September 18 in which he demanded removal of a senior official and reminded about Rs 20 crore budget for electronic media, adding that &ldquo;until you decide these crucial issues, we will not accept advertisements of this government in protest&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p> \tRefuting the charges of blackmail, Chandra admitted to have written the letters and claimed it&rsquo;s his right to demand advertisement. &ldquo;Hum to ailaniya taur per kehte hain ki haan ye vigyapan ka masla hai. Every channel has a right to demand advertisement. We are not blackmailing anyone, not asking in cash, but in cheque, not just for us but for all channels. We have written to five CMs,&rdquo; Chandra told The Sunday Express.<\/p>\n<p> \tAsked if it was appropriate for him to demand the removal of senior officials and threaten to reject advertisements, he said: &ldquo;Their behaviour has been very humiliating towards our marketing people. They promised to give us advertisement but never gave&#8230; we were humiliated. We had to reject.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> \tRaman Singh has termed the report a &ldquo;bundle of lies and concoction&rdquo; and has slapped Rs 1-crore defamation suits on Etv and Patrika, the newspaper that carried the report.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"> \t<strong>\u0907\u0902\u0921\u093f\u092f\u0928 \u090f\u0915\u094d\u0938\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936\u093f\u0924 \u0906\u0936\u0941\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092d\u093e\u0930\u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0940<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> \tRaipur : It began as an expose: the story of how Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh&rsquo;s relatives allegedly received illegal mining contracts in Madhya Pradesh. Then, a tale of arm-twisting: government officials forced cable operators to pull out the news channel, Etv MP, that aired the story. Now, the story has a twist: Allegations of a failed &ldquo;paid-news&rdquo; deal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-print"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bhadas4media.com\/old1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}