Mr. Markandeya Katju, This mail is in connection with the letter you wrote to governor of Maharashtra state Mr. K. Sankarnarayanan to pardon Sanjay Dutt and set him free under article 161. Sir, You are the chairman of Press council of India . I want to ask you one question…
what do you mean by justice?
Sanjay Dutt found guilty in possession of a prohibited weapon AK 56. It was such an automatic gun which keeps firing until release of the pressure on the trigger.
Such kind of weapon is for the use of destruction and not for simple protection.
As per Mr. Dutt’s confession in 1994 , he received AK56 rifle from Mafia Don Abu Salem, Samir Hingora and Hanif Kadawala while their visit of Mr. Dutt’s house in 1993. . ( Keep in mind, his connections with Mafia Don Abu Salem!!!! ) .He claimed the rifle was to protect his family
A question,
if his family was needed protection why had he not approached Maharashtra police for police protection?
He also asked his friend Yusuf Nulwalla to destroy the rifle only after Samir Hingora and Hanif Kadawala’s arrest.
A question, why to destroy rifle ? why had he not informed police deptt.about the rifle and its source of receipt?
You, in your letter asked to pardon Sanjay Dutt by linking his case with the case of Mr. K.M.Nanavati and taking the base of his pardoned by Maharashtra Governor Vijyalaxmi Pandit.
I think you are very well aware of the case of Mr. K.M.Nanavati, if not go through the below link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KM_Nanavati_v_State_of_Maharashtra
Mr. K.M.Nanavati killed Mr. Prem Ahuja who cheated his wife and just took the benefits of his absenteeism.
Do you found any similarities between both the cases?
Mr. K.M.Nanavati was a naval commander and killed the person who was the cheater and misusing his absenteeism whereas Mr. Sanjay Dutt was a drug addict and keeping the company of terrorist and dons. He completely behaved as an anti social element.
You favored him by the characters of his parents. Laws are made for all. And one must obey the laws and no relaxations to be made for the criminals.
You favored him by his act in the film on Mahatma Gandhi but I want to draw your attention towards the roles he played as Kancha China in “Agneepath” and in movie “Khalnayak.”
Roles played on the reel life is different thing and the role played in real life is different thing.
You are mixing them.
And the fact is that he is criminal and must go to the jail.
Such kind of persons are role model to the society if they do the mistakes and be forgave by the laws, then the society will be going to follow them obviously. Sanjay Dutt made a crime so he must be punished so that the public will get the example from his case and will not repeat the mistake.
By your such kind of favoring you are going to settle the wrong trend. It does not suit you as you are the chairman of the PCI.
Have you have any intention to enter the politics afterwards? Or just the paying back to your congress supporters. Or just favoring as late Mr. Sunil Dutt was known to you.
Have you any prejudice with the decisions made by the courts of India ? In one case where Narendra Modi was given clean chit you are comparing him with Adolf Hitler and called him liar. And in 2nd case of Sanjay Dutt, where he was awarded 3.5 years of jail, you are favoring him and saving him.
Pls. take a note we, the citizens of India are not fools. We also understand everything. We are not going to tolerate such kind of double standards any more.
Take your appeal back as early as possible.
Thanking you in advance,
Citizen Of India .
durgesh tiwari
